Iowa farmers adopt ICM practices
|
Extension educators have been promoting various Integrated Crop Management (ICM) techniques for years. Many producers, farm managers, professional agronomists, and crop consultants have used ICM practices selectively, but few are implementing the total ICM package. In the fall of 1993, a two-year statewide ICM training program was initiated by ISU extension's program for Integrated Pesticide Management (IPM). One of the sites was located in north central Iowa where three growers who farmed a total of 1,947 acres participated in an ICM demonstration. The goal was to show that a complete ICM program could be profitable and environmentally responsible. The three cooperators received digitized soil maps of the land in the demonstration program. Soils were sampled by major soil mapping unit and appropriate fertilizer recommendations were developed. Cooperators also received recommendations on variety selection, seeding rates, tillage and machinery selection, and timing of field operations. Scouting services were provided throughout both growing seasons in the project. All three cooperators maintained enterprise records, which were summarized to provide an accurate economic analysis. In addition, extension staff conducted on-farm demonstrations related to manure application rates, use of nitrogen testing, date-of-planting, and special weed control techniques. These on-farm demonstration sites were used as teaching stops during county crop tours. Results of the two-year ICM project included:
As a result of their participation, cooperators were more confident in making their own decisions and more selective in accepting the advice given by agricultural professionals with a product or service to sell. Cooperators said the planning segment of the ICM program required that they formally identify short- and long-term goals and that this offered an "excuse" to raise and discuss these issues with other family members. The participants indicated they enjoyed the recognition they had received as being an ISU Extension cooperator, and that they wished to continue the relationship even if they had to pay for the service. This article originally appeared on pages 184-185 of the IC-476(25) -- November 11, 1996 issue. Updated 05/23/2005 - 5:24am
|


