For most producers, it is important that every field operation leave the maximum amount of residue cover on the soil surface. However, for those producers who use manure as a nutrient, reducing odors from manure applications is equally important because neighbors often complain more often about odor from manure application than about odor from the facilities. Producers find themselves balancing good crop residue cover and the reduction of odor from manure applications.

Above: Narrow knives on a drag hose applicator.
Several researchers recently presented their findings about the effects of manure application equipment on odor, residue cover, and crop yields. The experiments evaluated swine pit manure (liquid) application methods in no-till soybean and corn residue during three crop seasons (1996-1998). Crop yield levels were taken at harvest.

Above: Sweep incorporation on a tank applicator.
Below: Covering discs on a tank agitator.

Manure was applied by one of six different treatments (in the spring and fall of each of the three crop seasons). Residue was measured immediately before and after each treatment, and odor samples were taken from the surface within 5 minutes after the manure was applied, and 1 day after treatment (or later, depending on weather conditions).
For this study, the manure was applied to the field at a rate of 5,000 gallons per acre, at an applicator speed of 5 miles per hour. Researchers used a Better-Bilt vacuum tank, model 3400 (3,400-gallon capacity) manufactured by Top Air Manufacturing. The tank had an attached tool bar with four manure outlets set at a 30-inch spacing to apply manure between 30-inch rows. The liquid manure was applied by one of six methods: 1) injection with a conventional knife (2 inches in width); 2) injection with a conventional sweep (16 inches in width); 3) surface broadcast application followed by disk incorporation (manure outlets raised to 12 inches above the soil surface and diffusing the manure on a splash plate just below the outlet); 4) surface broadcast application only (manure outlets raised to 12 inches above soil surface and diffusing the manure on a splash plate just below the outlet); 5) injection with a narrow-profile knife (a 1-inch knife designed to minimize soil disturbance); or 6) surface application behind "row cleaners" (accomplished by moving residue from a narrow strip with a spoke wheel row cleaner, applying manure in a narrow surface band, then returning the residue over the band with spoke closing wheels).
In general, researchers found that incorporation methods resulted in higher corn yields (but not soybean yields) and lower odor. Choice of incorporation method to maintain residue cover was more important in soybean stubble with the narrow-row profile knife (5), row cleaner (6), and conventional knife methods (1), leaving more residue than injection with conventional sweeps (2) and broadcast application followed by disking (3). In corn residue, conventional knife incorporation (2) maintained residue cover as well as other incorporation methods. And surface applications resulted in higher odor levels but better preservation of crop residues.
If odor during application is a concern, avoid broadcast application methods--soil incorporation reduced odor levels by 20 to 90 percent compared with broadcast operations. (Refer to the tables for more information.)
For producers looking for answers, the best solution may lie in determining the ability of their equipment to reach an acceptable balance between reducing odor thresholds, maintaining residue cover, and affecting crop yields.
| SOYBEAN | After manure application |
After planting | After manure application |
After planting | After manure application |
After planting | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Residue remaining and residue cover+ |
1995-96 residue remaining* |
1995-96 residue cover+ |
1995-96 residue remaining* |
1995-96 residue cover+ |
1996-97 residue remaining* |
1996-97 residue cover+ |
1996-97 residue remaining* |
1996-97 residue cover+ |
1997-98 residue remaining* |
1997-98 residue cover+ |
1997-98 residue remaining* |
1997-98 residue cover+ |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Fall | 54 | 47 | 31 | 12 | 71 | 68 | 83 | 55 | 60 | 44 | 106 | 43 | |
| Spring | 52 | 36 | 37 | 11 | 56 | 45 | 98 | 43 | 54 | 32 | 113 | 30 | |
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Application | |||||||||||||
| Broadcast | 92 | 72 | 18 | 13 | 93 | 82 | 89 | 72 | 103 | 68 | 70 | 47 | |
| Row cleaner | 44 | 35 | 48 | 14 | 78 | 69 | 83 | 54 | 65 | 42 | 104 | 43 | |
| Narrow knife | 67 | 47 | 23 | 12 | 71 | 63 | 87 | 54 | 49 | 33 | 114 | 37 | |
| Disk/incorporate | 31 | 25 | 40 | 8 | 34 | 31 | 94 | 27 | 25 | 17 | 136 | 22 | |
| Sweep | 34 | 26 | 45 | 12 | 45 | 40 | 86 | 34 | 42 | 28 | 131 | 33 | |
| Knife | 55 | 43 | 26 | 11 | 59 | 52 | 105 | 53 | 57 | 38 | 104 | 38 | |
|
|
|||||||||||||
*Residue remaining = (% residue cover after operation/%residue cover before operation) x 100%. For example if 80% residue cover exists before field operation and 60% cover exists after operation, residue remaining = 75% [(60%/80%) x 100%].
+Percentage residue cover after operation (= 60% in example from *).
| CORN | After manure application |
After planting | After manure application |
After planting | After manure application |
After planting | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Residue remaining and residue cover+ |
1995-96 residue remaining* |
1995-96 residue cover+ |
1995-96 residue remaining* |
1995-96 residue cover+ |
1996-97 residue remaining* |
1996-97 residue cover+ |
1996-97 residue remaining* |
1996-97 residue cover+ |
1997-98 residue remaining* |
1997-98 residue cover+ |
1997-98 residue remaining* |
1997-98 residue cover+ |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Fall | 85 | 80 | 48 | 41 | 82 | 77 | 78 | 60 | 65 | 60 | 77 | 43 | |
| Spring | 81 | 76 | 53 | 38 | 71 | 62 | 95 | 57 | 76 | 62 | 75 | 39 | |
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Application | |||||||||||||
| Broadcast | 100 | 94 | 43 | 40 | 98 | 89 | 79 | 70 | 98 | 86 | 58 | 50 | |
| Row cleaner | 86 | 81 | 50 | 40 | 78 | 71 | 87 | 60 | 81 | 70 | 50 | 34 | |
| Narrow knife | 85 | 80 | 48 | 43 | 75 | 68 | 81 | 54 | 69 | 60 | 80 | 43 | |
| Disk/incorporate | 81 | 76 | 50 | 37 | 71 | 65 | 79 | 50 | 34 | 30 | 106 | 30 | |
| Sweep | 64 | 61 | 66 | 38 | 63 | 57 | 97 | 54 | 57 | 50 | 85 | 40 | |
| Knife | 82 | 77 | 46 | 38 | 74 | 67 | 96 | 63 | 78 | 68 | 77 | 49 | |
|
|
|||||||||||||
*Residue remaining = (% residue cover after operation/%residue cover before operation) x 100%. For example if 80% residue cover exists before field operation and 60% cover exists after operation, residue remaining = 75% [(60%/80%) x 100%].
+Percentage residue cover after operation (= 60% in example from *).
| Odor from manure application on soybean residue |
Fall 1996 At application |
Fall 1996 1 day after application |
Fall 1996 5 days after application |
Spring 1997 At application |
Spring 1997 1 day after application |
Fall 1997 At application |
Fall 1997 1 day after application |
Spring 1998 At application |
Spring 1998 1 day after application |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||||||||
| (odor units) | ||||||||||||
| Broadcast | 807 | 876 | 63 | 140 | 40 | 162 | 94 | 1451 | 211 | |||
| Row cleaner | 185 | 52 | 43 | 61 | 44 | 81 | 114 | 45 | 158 | |||
| Narrow knife | 173 | 64 | 60 | 12 | 36 | 85 | 97 | 181 | 87 | |||
| Disk/incorporate | 65 | 53 | 43 | 26 | 13 | 121 | 96 | 302 | 98 | |||
| Sweep | 94 | 60 | 43 | 35 | 16 | 102 | 109 | 181 | 64 | |||
| Knife | 256 | 113 | 43 | 33 | 43 | 128 | 98 | 257 | 72 | |||
| Untreated soil | -- | -- | -- | -- | 12 | -- | 94 | 241 | 84 | |||
|
|
||||||||||||
Odor units are the number of clean-air dilutions required to reach a threshold odor level for a panel of four observers.
| Odor from manure application on corn residue |
Fall 1996 At application |
Fall 1996 5 days after application |
Spring 1997 At application |
Spring 1997 1 day after application |
Fall 1997 At application |
Fall 1997 1 day after application |
Spring 1998 At application |
Spring 1998 1 day after application |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||
| (odor units) | |||||||||
| Broadcast | 389 | 43 | 216 | 30 | 183 | 115 | 1604 | 196 | |
| Row cleaner | 67 | 43 | 188 | 30 | 100 | 86 | 385 | 82 | |
| Narrow knife | 247 | 70 | 106 | 38 | 82 | 109 | 181 | 85 | |
| Disk/incorporate | 75 | 43 | 56 | 25 | 157 | 91 | 273 | 60 | |
| Sweep | 57 | 43 | 25 | 26 | 122 | 76 | 136 | 38 | |
| Knife | 502 | 53 | 16 | 18 | 116 | 105 | 121 | 73 | |
| Untreated soil | -- | -- | -- | 12 | -- | 118 | 241 | 94 | |
|
|
|||||||||
Odor units are the number of clean-air dilutions required to reach a threshold odor level for a panel of four observers.
This article originally appeared on pages 175-177 of the IC-482(23) -- October 11, 1999 issue.